copyparty vs Tiny File Manager

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyTiny File Manager
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonPHP
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 5,959
First released20192016
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveGoogle Drive

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose Tiny File Manager if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
Tiny File Manager details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Tiny File Manager better?

Neither is universally better. copyparty has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are copyparty and Tiny File Manager free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Tiny File Manager under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Tiny File Manager with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Tiny File Manager: yes.

Related comparisons