Cloudreve vs copyparty
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Cloudreve
File management and sharing system, supports multiple storage
VS
copyparty
Portable file server with accelerated resumable uploads
| Feature | Cloudreve | copyparty |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 97 · Excellent | 100 · Excellent |
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,751 | ★ 46,774 |
| First released | None | 2019 |
| Replaces | Google Drive | Dropbox, Google Drive |
What are Cloudreve and copyparty?
Cloudreve
Cloudreve is a file management and sharing system with a polished web UI that supports local, S3, OneDrive and other storage backends. It targets users who want a personal cloud drive with sharing links. It is deployed via a single Go binary or Docker.
- Multiple storage backends
- Shareable links with passwords
- WebDAV access
- Multi-user with quotas
copyparty
copyparty is a portable file server with features including resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, and media indexing. It runs from a single Python file with no dependencies.
- Accelerated resumable uploads
- WebDAV, FTP, and TFTP support
- Single-file Python deployment
Cloudreve vs copyparty: key differences
Cloudreve is written in Go, while copyparty is built with Python. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for Cloudreve versus MIT for copyparty. Copyparty is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Cloudreve.
Why pick each one
Choose Cloudreve if…
- Multiple storage backends
- Single Go binary
- Polished web interface
Watch out for
- Docs partly in Chinese
- Some features Pro-only
Choose copyparty if…
- Single-file deployment
- Fast resumable uploads
- WebDAV and FTP built in
Watch out for
- Unconventional interface
- Many flags to learn
Frequently asked questions
Is Cloudreve or copyparty better?
copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Cloudreve if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Cloudreve and copyparty free and open-source?
Yes. Cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and copyparty under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cloudreve and copyparty with Docker?
Cloudreve: yes. copyparty: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Cloudreve or copyparty?
copyparty has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Cloudreve. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.