copyparty vs Dufs

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyDufs
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguagePythonRust
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB32 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 10,562
First released20192022
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose Dufs if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Dufs details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Dufs better?

Neither is universally better. copyparty has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are copyparty and Dufs free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Dufs under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Dufs with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Dufs: yes.

Related comparisons