CryptPad vs Dufs
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CryptPad
End-to-end encrypted collaboration suite
VS
Dufs
Distinctive utility file server with WebDAV support
| Feature | CryptPad | Dufs |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,832 | ★ 10,562 |
| First released | 2015 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Microsoft 365 | Dropbox, Google Drive |
Why pick each one
Choose CryptPad if…
- Strong privacy guarantees
- Real-time collaboration
- No account needed to start
Choose Dufs if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is CryptPad or Dufs better?
Dufs is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CryptPad if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are CryptPad and Dufs free and open-source?
Yes. CryptPad is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Dufs under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CryptPad and Dufs with Docker?
CryptPad: yes. Dufs: yes.