CryptPad vs FileBrowser Quantum
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CryptPad
End-to-end encrypted collaboration suite
VS
FileBrowser Quantum
Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features
| Feature | CryptPad | FileBrowser Quantum |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,832 | ★ 7,695 |
| First released | 2015 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Microsoft 365 | Google Drive, Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose CryptPad if…
- Strong privacy guarantees
- Real-time collaboration
- No account needed to start
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is CryptPad or FileBrowser Quantum better?
Neither is universally better. CryptPad has the larger community, while FileBrowser Quantum is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CryptPad and FileBrowser Quantum free and open-source?
Yes. CryptPad is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and FileBrowser Quantum under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CryptPad and FileBrowser Quantum with Docker?
CryptPad: yes. FileBrowser Quantum: yes.