SHSelfHostIndex

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin vs copyparty

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
C closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin Global name system for secure file sharing VS copyparty Portable file server with accelerated resumable uploads
Feature closet GoToSocial NoNo upspincopyparty
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectUnder-an-hour setup
Health score39 · At risk100 · Excellent
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMIT
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 6,404★ 46,774
First released20162019
ReplacesDropboxDropbox, Google Drive

What are closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and copyparty?

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin

Upspin is an experimental framework from Google for naming and sharing files securely across the internet. It gives every file a globally unique name and end-to-end encrypted access control.

  • Global file naming system
  • End-to-end encrypted sharing
  • Fine-grained access groups

copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server with features including resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, and media indexing. It runs from a single Python file with no dependencies.

  • Accelerated resumable uploads
  • WebDAV, FTP, and TFTP support
  • Single-file Python deployment

Read the full copyparty guide →

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin vs copyparty: key differences

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin is written in Go, while copyparty is built with Python. Licensing differs — BSD-3-Clause for closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin versus MIT for copyparty. Copyparty is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin. closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin is the more established project (first released 2016), while copyparty arrived in 2019. Copyparty has the considerably larger community, at 46,774 GitHub stars versus 6,404. Copyparty lists first-class Docker deployment; closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin does not.

Why pick each one

Choose closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 6.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin details

Choose copyparty if…

  • Single-file deployment
  • Fast resumable uploads
  • WebDAV and FTP built in

Watch out for

  • Unconventional interface
  • Many flags to learn
copyparty details

Frequently asked questions

Is closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin or copyparty better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and copyparty free and open-source?

Yes. closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and copyparty under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and copyparty with Docker?

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin: check the project docs for container support. copyparty: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin or copyparty?

copyparty has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons