SHSelfHostIndex

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin vs Dufs

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
C closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin Global name system for secure file sharing VS DU Dufs Distinctive utility file server with WebDAV support
Feature closet GoToSocial NoNo upspinDufs
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectUnder-an-hour setup
Health score39 · At risk86 · Excellent
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseApache-2.0
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM128 MB32 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 6,404★ 10,778
First released20162022
ReplacesDropboxDropbox, Google Drive

What are closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and Dufs?

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin

Upspin is an experimental framework from Google for naming and sharing files securely across the internet. It gives every file a globally unique name and end-to-end encrypted access control.

  • Global file naming system
  • End-to-end encrypted sharing
  • Fine-grained access groups

Dufs

Dufs is a lightweight single-binary file server that supports static serving, uploading, searching, and WebDAV. It offers access control, resumable uploads, and a clean web UI.

  • Single-binary file server
  • WebDAV support
  • Access control and resumable uploads

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin vs Dufs: key differences

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin is written in Go, while Dufs is built with Rust. Licensing differs — BSD-3-Clause for closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin versus Apache-2.0 for Dufs. Dufs is the lighter option, starting around 32 MB of RAM against 128 MB for closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin. closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin is the more established project (first released 2016), while Dufs arrived in 2022. Dufs lists first-class Docker deployment; closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin does not.

Why pick each one

Choose closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 6.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin details

Choose Dufs if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.8k GitHub stars
Dufs details

Frequently asked questions

Is closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin or Dufs better?

Dufs is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and Dufs free and open-source?

Yes. closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Dufs under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and Dufs with Docker?

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin: check the project docs for container support. Dufs: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin or Dufs?

Dufs has the smaller minimum footprint at 32 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons