Dufs vs File Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDufsFile Browser
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 10,562★ 35,800
First released20222017
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Dufs if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Dufs details

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is Dufs or File Browser better?

Neither is universally better. File Browser has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Dufs and File Browser free and open-source?

Yes. Dufs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and File Browser under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Dufs and File Browser with Docker?

Dufs: yes. File Browser: yes.

Related comparisons