Ceph vs copyparty

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCephcopyparty
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseLGPL-2.1MIT
LanguageC++Python
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM4,096 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 16,905★ 46,121
First released20062019
ReplacesAmazon S3, Google DriveDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Ceph if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 16.9k GitHub stars
Ceph details

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ceph or copyparty better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Ceph if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Ceph and copyparty free and open-source?

Yes. Ceph is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and copyparty under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ceph and copyparty with Docker?

Ceph: yes. copyparty: yes.

Related comparisons