Ceph vs Cloudreve
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ceph
Distributed object, block, and file storage platform
VS
Cloudreve
File management and sharing system, supports multiple storage
| Feature | Ceph | Cloudreve |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | LGPL-2.1 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 16,905 | ★ 28,485 |
| First released | 2006 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Amazon S3, Google Drive | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Ceph if…
- Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 16.9k GitHub stars
Choose Cloudreve if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 28.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Ceph or Cloudreve better?
Cloudreve is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Ceph if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Ceph and Cloudreve free and open-source?
Yes. Ceph is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and Cloudreve under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ceph and Cloudreve with Docker?
Ceph: yes. Cloudreve: yes.