CryptPad vs Tiny File Manager

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCryptPadTiny File Manager
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score91 · Excellent69 · Good
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 7,953★ 5,978
First released20152016
ReplacesGoogle Drive, Microsoft 365Google Drive

What are CryptPad and Tiny File Manager?

CryptPad

CryptPad is an end-to-end encrypted collaboration suite with documents, spreadsheets, and a personal drive, where the server cannot read user data. It suits privacy-focused individuals and teams. It is deployed via Docker or a Node.js installation.

  • Zero-knowledge end-to-end encryption
  • Real-time collaborative editing
  • Documents, sheets and forms
  • Personal encrypted drive

Read the full CryptPad guide →

Tiny File Manager

Tiny File Manager is a web-based file manager contained in a single PHP file. It provides multi-user support, file editing, archive handling, and a clean responsive interface.

  • Single-file deployment
  • Built-in code editor
  • Multi-user access control

CryptPad vs Tiny File Manager: key differences

CryptPad is written in JavaScript, while Tiny File Manager is built with PHP. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for CryptPad versus GPL-3.0 for Tiny File Manager. Tiny File Manager is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 512 MB for CryptPad.

Why pick each one

Choose CryptPad if…

  • Strong privacy guarantees
  • Real-time collaboration
  • No account needed to start

Watch out for

  • Encryption limits server-side search
  • Heavier client than plain editors
CryptPad details

Choose Tiny File Manager if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
Tiny File Manager details

Frequently asked questions

Is CryptPad or Tiny File Manager better?

Neither is universally better. CryptPad has the larger community, while Tiny File Manager is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are CryptPad and Tiny File Manager free and open-source?

Yes. CryptPad is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tiny File Manager under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CryptPad and Tiny File Manager with Docker?

CryptPad: yes. Tiny File Manager: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, CryptPad or Tiny File Manager?

Tiny File Manager has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for CryptPad. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons