Dufs vs Tiny File Manager

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDufsTiny File Manager
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageRustPHP
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 10,562★ 5,959
First released20222016
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveGoogle Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Dufs if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Dufs details

Choose Tiny File Manager if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
Tiny File Manager details

Frequently asked questions

Is Dufs or Tiny File Manager better?

Neither is universally better. Dufs has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Dufs and Tiny File Manager free and open-source?

Yes. Dufs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tiny File Manager under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Dufs and Tiny File Manager with Docker?

Dufs: yes. Tiny File Manager: yes.

Related comparisons