Ceph vs Tiny File Manager

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCephTiny File Manager
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseLGPL-2.1GPL-3.0
LanguageC++PHP
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM4,096 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metalbare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 16,905★ 5,959
First released20062016
ReplacesAmazon S3, Google DriveGoogle Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Ceph if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 16.9k GitHub stars
Ceph details

Choose Tiny File Manager if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
Tiny File Manager details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ceph or Tiny File Manager better?

Neither is universally better. Ceph has the larger community, while Tiny File Manager is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Ceph and Tiny File Manager free and open-source?

Yes. Ceph is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and Tiny File Manager under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ceph and Tiny File Manager with Docker?

Ceph: yes. Tiny File Manager: yes.

Related comparisons