Filestash vs Plone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Filestash
Web-based file manager and document gateway
VS
Plone
Enterprise CMS and document repository with strong security
| Feature | Filestash | Plone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,451 | ★ 310 |
| First released | 2017 | 2001 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, SharePoint | SharePoint |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Filestash or Plone better?
Filestash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Plone if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Filestash and Plone free and open-source?
Yes. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Plone under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Filestash and Plone with Docker?
Filestash: yes. Plone: yes.