Filestash vs OpenKM Community
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Filestash
Web-based file manager and document gateway
VS
OpenKM Community
Enterprise document management and content platform
| Feature | Filestash | OpenKM Community |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,451 | ★ 850 |
| First released | 2017 | 2006 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, SharePoint | DocuWare, SharePoint |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenKM Community if…
- Comprehensive enterprise features
- Mature platform
Frequently asked questions
Is Filestash or OpenKM Community better?
Filestash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenKM Community if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Filestash and OpenKM Community free and open-source?
Yes. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and OpenKM Community under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Filestash and OpenKM Community with Docker?
Filestash: yes. OpenKM Community: yes.