Alfresco Community Edition vs OpenKM Community
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Alfresco Community Edition
Enterprise content and document management platform
VS
OpenKM Community
Enterprise document management and content platform
| Feature | Alfresco Community Edition | OpenKM Community |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 226 | ★ 850 |
| First released | 2005 | 2006 |
| Replaces | SharePoint, Documentum | DocuWare, SharePoint |
Why pick each one
Choose Alfresco Community Edition if…
- Enterprise grade features
- Strong API
Choose OpenKM Community if…
- Comprehensive enterprise features
- Mature platform
Frequently asked questions
Is Alfresco Community Edition or OpenKM Community better?
Neither is universally better. OpenKM Community has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Alfresco Community Edition and OpenKM Community free and open-source?
Yes. Alfresco Community Edition is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and OpenKM Community under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Alfresco Community Edition and OpenKM Community with Docker?
Alfresco Community Edition: yes. OpenKM Community: yes.
Related comparisons
- Alfresco Community Edition vs BentoPDF
- OpenKM Community vs BentoPDF
- Alfresco Community Edition vs Documenso
- OpenKM Community vs Documenso
- Alfresco Community Edition vs DocuSeal
- OpenKM Community vs DocuSeal
- Alfresco Community Edition vs Filestash
- OpenKM Community vs Filestash
- Alfresco Community Edition vs Gotenberg
- OpenKM Community vs Gotenberg