Alfresco Community Edition vs Filestash
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Alfresco Community Edition
Enterprise content and document management platform
VS
Filestash
Web-based file manager and document gateway
| Feature | Alfresco Community Edition | Filestash |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 226 | ★ 14,451 |
| First released | 2005 | 2017 |
| Replaces | SharePoint, Documentum | Dropbox, SharePoint |
Why pick each one
Choose Alfresco Community Edition if…
- Enterprise grade features
- Strong API
Frequently asked questions
Is Alfresco Community Edition or Filestash better?
Filestash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Alfresco Community Edition if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Alfresco Community Edition and Filestash free and open-source?
Yes. Alfresco Community Edition is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Filestash under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Alfresco Community Edition and Filestash with Docker?
Alfresco Community Edition: yes. Filestash: yes.
Related comparisons
- Alfresco Community Edition vs BentoPDF
- Filestash vs BentoPDF
- Alfresco Community Edition vs Documenso
- Filestash vs Documenso
- Alfresco Community Edition vs DocuSeal
- Filestash vs DocuSeal
- Alfresco Community Edition vs Gotenberg
- Filestash vs Gotenberg
- Alfresco Community Edition vs Nuxeo Platform
- Filestash vs Nuxeo Platform