OpenKM Community vs Plone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | OpenKM Community | Plone |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 15 · At risk | 72 · Good |
| Status | Archived | Actively maintained |
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 849 | ★ 310 |
| First released | 2006 | 2001 |
| Replaces | DocuWare, SharePoint | SharePoint |
What are OpenKM Community and Plone?
OpenKM Community
OpenKM is an enterprise content management system with a community edition for storing and managing documents and records. It offers workflows, metadata, OCR, and granular security controls.
- Workflow automation
- Metadata and records management
- OCR and full-text search
- Fine-grained security
Plone
Plone is a mature open-source content management system widely used as a secure document repository and intranet. It offers fine-grained workflow, versioning, and permissions on every content item.
- Granular workflows
- Content versioning
- Strong security model
- Extensible add-ons
OpenKM Community vs Plone: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: OpenKM Community's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Plone is actively maintained. OpenKM Community is written in Java, while Plone is built with Python. Plone is the lighter option, starting around 1,024 MB of RAM against 2,048 MB for OpenKM Community. Plone is the more established project (first released 2001), while OpenKM Community arrived in 2006. OpenKM Community has the considerably larger community, at 849 GitHub stars versus 310.
Why pick each one
Choose OpenKM Community if…
- Comprehensive enterprise features
- Mature platform
Watch out for
- Heavy resource use
- Complex administration
Choose Plone if…
- Battle-tested security
- Highly customizable
Watch out for
- Steep learning curve
- Heavy stack
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenKM Community or Plone better?
Neither is universally better. OpenKM Community has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are OpenKM Community and Plone free and open-source?
Yes. OpenKM Community is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Plone under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenKM Community and Plone with Docker?
OpenKM Community: yes. Plone: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, OpenKM Community or Plone?
Plone has the smaller minimum footprint at 1,024 MB of RAM, compared to about 2,048 MB for OpenKM Community. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- OpenKM Community vs Aleph
- OpenKM Community vs Alfresco Community Edition
- Plone vs Alfresco Community Edition
- OpenKM Community vs Ambar
- OpenKM Community vs ecoDMS
- OpenKM Community vs Filestash
- Plone vs Filestash
- OpenKM Community vs Krystal DMS
- OpenKM Community vs LogicalDOC Community
- OpenKM Community vs Mayan EDMS