Dufs vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDufsResilio Sync alternative Onionshare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageRustPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 10,562★ 7,055
First released20222014
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveWeTransfer, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Dufs if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Dufs details

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Frequently asked questions

Is Dufs or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare better?

Dufs is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Dufs and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare free and open-source?

Yes. Dufs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Dufs and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare with Docker?

Dufs: yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons