Dufs vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Dufs | Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 86 · Excellent | 91 · Excellent |
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,778 | ★ 7,098 |
| First released | 2022 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, Google Drive | WeTransfer, Dropbox |
What are Dufs and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare?
Dufs
Dufs is a lightweight single-binary file server that supports static serving, uploading, searching, and WebDAV. It offers access control, resumable uploads, and a clean web UI.
- Single-binary file server
- WebDAV support
- Access control and resumable uploads
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare
OnionShare is an open-source tool that lets you securely and anonymously share files using the Tor network. It can also host websites and run a chat server accessible only as a Tor onion service.
- Anonymous sharing over Tor
- No central server needed
- Host sites and chat anonymously
Dufs vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: key differences
Dufs is written in Rust, while Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is built with Python. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Dufs versus GPL-3.0 for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare. Dufs is the lighter option, starting around 32 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is the more established project (first released 2014), while Dufs arrived in 2022. Dufs lists first-class Docker deployment; Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Dufs if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.8k GitHub stars
Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Dufs or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare better?
Dufs is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Dufs and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare free and open-source?
Yes. Dufs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dufs and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare with Docker?
Dufs: yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Dufs or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare?
Dufs has the smaller minimum footprint at 32 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Dufs vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- Dufs vs Ceph
- Dufs vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- Dufs vs Cloudreve
- Dufs vs copyparty
- Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare vs copyparty
- Dufs vs CryptPad
- Dufs vs File Browser
- Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare vs File Browser