File Browser vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserResilio Sync alternative Onionshare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 7,055
First released20172014
ReplacesDropboxWeTransfer, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons