SHSelfHostIndex

FileBrowser Quantum vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features VS RE Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare Anonymous file sharing over the Tor network
FeatureFileBrowser QuantumResilio Sync alternative Onionshare
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupRead-the-docs project
Health score92 · Excellent91 · Excellent
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 8,406★ 7,098
First released20242014
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxWeTransfer, Dropbox

What are FileBrowser Quantum and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare?

FileBrowser Quantum

FileBrowser Quantum is a community fork of File Browser that adds advanced search, multiple sources, and improved performance. It provides a web interface for managing files on a server.

  • Advanced indexed search
  • Multiple file sources
  • Improved performance over original

Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

OnionShare is an open-source tool that lets you securely and anonymously share files using the Tor network. It can also host websites and run a chat server accessible only as a Tor onion service.

  • Anonymous sharing over Tor
  • No central server needed
  • Host sites and chat anonymously

FileBrowser Quantum vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: key differences

FileBrowser Quantum is written in Go, while Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is built with Python. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for FileBrowser Quantum versus GPL-3.0 for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare. FileBrowser Quantum is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is the more established project (first released 2014), while FileBrowser Quantum arrived in 2024. FileBrowser Quantum lists first-class Docker deployment; Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare does not.

Why pick each one

Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 8.4k GitHub stars
FileBrowser Quantum details

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Frequently asked questions

Is FileBrowser Quantum or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare better?

FileBrowser Quantum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are FileBrowser Quantum and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare free and open-source?

Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare with Docker?

FileBrowser Quantum: yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, FileBrowser Quantum or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare?

FileBrowser Quantum has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons