SHSelfHostIndex

FileBrowser Quantum vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FI FileBrowser Quantum Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features VS RE Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare Anonymous file sharing over the Tor network
FeatureFileBrowser QuantumResilio Sync alternative Onionshare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 7,695★ 7,055
First released20242014
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxWeTransfer, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
FileBrowser Quantum details

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Frequently asked questions

Is FileBrowser Quantum or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare better?

FileBrowser Quantum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are FileBrowser Quantum and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare free and open-source?

Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare with Docker?

FileBrowser Quantum: yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons