copyparty vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up? Compare copyparty with Compare Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare with

copyparty Portable file server with accelerated resumable uploads VS RE Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare Anonymous file sharing over the Tor network

Feature	copyparty	Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare
Deploy effort	Under-an-hour setup	Read-the-docs project
Health score	100 · Excellent	91 · Excellent
Category	File Sync & Storage	File Sync & Storage
License	MIT	GPL-3.0
Language	Python	Python
Setup difficulty	Easy	Medium
Min. RAM	64 MB	256 MB
Deployment	docker, binary	binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars	★ 46,774	★ 7,098
First released	2019	2014
Replaces	Dropbox, Google Drive	WeTransfer, Dropbox

What are copyparty and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare?

copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server with features including resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, and media indexing. It runs from a single Python file with no dependencies.

Accelerated resumable uploads
WebDAV, FTP, and TFTP support
Single-file Python deployment

Read the full copyparty guide →

Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

OnionShare is an open-source tool that lets you securely and anonymously share files using the Tor network. It can also host websites and run a chat server accessible only as a Tor onion service.

Anonymous sharing over Tor
No central server needed
Host sites and chat anonymously

copyparty vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: key differences

Both projects are written in Python. Licensing differs — MIT for copyparty versus GPL-3.0 for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare. Copyparty is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is the more established project (first released 2014), while copyparty arrived in 2019. Copyparty has the considerably larger community, at 46,774 GitHub stars versus 7,098. Copyparty lists first-class Docker deployment; Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare does not.

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

Single-file deployment
Fast resumable uploads
WebDAV and FTP built in

Watch out for

Unconventional interface
Many flags to learn

copyparty details

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

Released under the GPL-3.0 license
Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
Written in Python
Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM

Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are copyparty and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, copyparty or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare?

copyparty has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.