TimeTracker vs Timewarrior
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
TimeTracker
Self-hosted web-based time tracking for teams
VS
Timewarrior
Command-line time tracking with powerful reporting
| Feature | TimeTracker | Timewarrior |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 615 | ★ 1,637 |
| First released | 2024 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Toggl, Harvest | Toggl |
Why pick each one
Choose TimeTracker if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Timewarrior if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is TimeTracker or Timewarrior better?
Timewarrior is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider TimeTracker if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are TimeTracker and Timewarrior free and open-source?
Yes. TimeTracker is licensed under MIT and Timewarrior under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run TimeTracker and Timewarrior with Docker?
TimeTracker: yes. Timewarrior: check the project docs for container support.