Timewarrior vs Titra
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Timewarrior
Command-line time tracking with powerful reporting
VS
Titra
Fast time tracking for freelancers and small teams
| Feature | Timewarrior | Titra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | C++ | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,637 | ★ 496 |
| First released | 2016 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Toggl | Toggl, Harvest, Clockify |
Why pick each one
Choose Timewarrior if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
Choose Titra if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Timewarrior or Titra better?
Neither is universally better. Timewarrior has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Timewarrior and Titra free and open-source?
Yes. Timewarrior is licensed under MIT and Titra under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Timewarrior and Titra with Docker?
Timewarrior: check the project docs for container support. Titra: yes.