TimeTracker vs Titra
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
TimeTracker
Self-hosted web-based time tracking for teams
VS
Titra
Fast time tracking for freelancers and small teams
| Feature | TimeTracker | Titra |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 80 · Excellent | 79 · Good |
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 628 | ★ 497 |
| First released | 2024 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Toggl, Harvest | Toggl, Harvest, Clockify |
What are TimeTracker and Titra?
TimeTracker
TimeTracker is a self-hosted web-based time tracking application for freelancers, teams, and businesses. It manages projects, logs billable time, and generates invoices, keeping all data under your control.
- Project-based time logging
- Invoice generation
- Multi-user accounts
- Self-hosted data control
Titra
Titra is an open-source time and project tracking tool. It is designed to be fast and simple, offering project management, time entry, and billing reports.
- Fast time entry
- Project and customer tracking
- Billing reports and exports
- Optional integrations
TimeTracker vs Titra: key differences
TimeTracker is written in Python, while Titra is built with JavaScript. TimeTracker is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Titra. Titra is the more established project (first released 2019), while TimeTracker arrived in 2024.
Why pick each one
Choose TimeTracker if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Titra if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is TimeTracker or Titra better?
Neither is universally better. TimeTracker has the larger community, while Titra is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are TimeTracker and Titra free and open-source?
Yes. TimeTracker is licensed under MIT and Titra under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run TimeTracker and Titra with Docker?
TimeTracker: yes. Titra: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, TimeTracker or Titra?
TimeTracker has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Titra. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.