TimeTracker vs Ever Teams
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
TimeTracker
Self-hosted web-based time tracking for teams
VS
Ever Teams
Open-source work time tracking and team management
| Feature | TimeTracker | Ever Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 80 · Excellent | 80 · Excellent |
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 628 | ★ 585 |
| First released | 2024 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Toggl, Harvest | Hubstaff, Toggl |
What are TimeTracker and Ever Teams?
TimeTracker
TimeTracker is a self-hosted web-based time tracking application for freelancers, teams, and businesses. It manages projects, logs billable time, and generates invoices, keeping all data under your control.
- Project-based time logging
- Invoice generation
- Multi-user accounts
- Self-hosted data control
Ever Teams
Ever Teams is an open-source work time tracking and team management application for productivity-focused organizations. It records hours against tasks and projects with timer modes and team activity views.
- Task-based time tracking
- Team activity view
- Timer modes
- Productivity reports
TimeTracker vs Ever Teams: key differences
TimeTracker is written in Python, while Ever Teams is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — MIT for TimeTracker versus AGPL-3.0 for Ever Teams. TimeTracker is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Ever Teams. Ever Teams is the more established project (first released 2022), while TimeTracker arrived in 2024.
Why pick each one
Choose TimeTracker if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Ever Teams if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is TimeTracker or Ever Teams better?
Neither is universally better. TimeTracker has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are TimeTracker and Ever Teams free and open-source?
Yes. TimeTracker is licensed under MIT and Ever Teams under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run TimeTracker and Ever Teams with Docker?
TimeTracker: yes. Ever Teams: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, TimeTracker or Ever Teams?
TimeTracker has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Ever Teams. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.