Anuko Time Tracker vs TimeTracker
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Anuko Time Tracker
Simple multi-user web time tracking system
VS
TimeTracker
Self-hosted web-based time tracking for teams
| Feature | Anuko Time Tracker | TimeTracker |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 207 | ★ 615 |
| First released | 2003 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Clockify, Harvest | Toggl, Harvest |
Why pick each one
Choose Anuko Time Tracker if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose TimeTracker if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Anuko Time Tracker or TimeTracker better?
Neither is universally better. TimeTracker has the larger community, while Anuko Time Tracker is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Anuko Time Tracker and TimeTracker free and open-source?
Yes. Anuko Time Tracker is licensed under GPL-3.0 and TimeTracker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anuko Time Tracker and TimeTracker with Docker?
Anuko Time Tracker: check the project docs for container support. TimeTracker: yes.