TimeTracker vs TimeCase
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
TimeTracker
Self-hosted web-based time tracking for teams
VS
TimeCase
Free self-hosted time tracking web application
| Feature | TimeTracker | TimeCase |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 80 · Excellent | 0 · At risk |
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 628 | ★ 21 |
| First released | 2024 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Toggl, Harvest | Clockify, Toggl |
What are TimeTracker and TimeCase?
TimeTracker
TimeTracker is a self-hosted web-based time tracking application for freelancers, teams, and businesses. It manages projects, logs billable time, and generates invoices, keeping all data under your control.
- Project-based time logging
- Invoice generation
- Multi-user accounts
- Self-hosted data control
TimeCase
TimeCase is a free, open-source, self-hosted time tracking web application for recording hours against projects and clients. It provides reporting to review how time is spent over a period.
- Project and client time logging
- Time reports
- Multi-user support
- Self-hosted deployment
TimeTracker vs TimeCase: key differences
TimeTracker is written in Python, while TimeCase is built with PHP. TimeCase is the more established project (first released 2020), while TimeTracker arrived in 2024. TimeTracker has the considerably larger community, at 628 GitHub stars versus 21.
Why pick each one
Choose TimeTracker if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose TimeCase if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is TimeTracker or TimeCase better?
Neither is universally better. TimeTracker has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are TimeTracker and TimeCase free and open-source?
Yes. TimeTracker is licensed under MIT and TimeCase under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run TimeTracker and TimeCase with Docker?
TimeTracker: yes. TimeCase: yes.