Anuko Time Tracker vs TimeTagger
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Anuko Time Tracker | TimeTagger |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 8 · At risk | 71 · Good |
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 208 | ★ 1,789 |
| First released | 2003 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Clockify, Harvest | Toggl, Harvest |
What are Anuko Time Tracker and TimeTagger?
Anuko Time Tracker
Anuko Time Tracker is a simple, easy to use, open-source web-based time tracking system. Teams use it to record time spent on projects and generate reports and invoices.
- Multi-user project tracking
- Reports and invoices
- Custom fields
- Multilingual interface
TimeTagger
TimeTagger is an open-source time tracking app with an interactive timeline interface. Records are organized with hashtags, making reporting fast and flexible.
- Interactive timeline view
- Hashtag-based organization
- Live reporting
- Works offline as a PWA
Anuko Time Tracker vs TimeTagger: key differences
Anuko Time Tracker is written in PHP, while TimeTagger is built with Python. TimeTagger is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Anuko Time Tracker. Anuko Time Tracker is the more established project (first released 2003), while TimeTagger arrived in 2021. TimeTagger has the considerably larger community, at 1,789 GitHub stars versus 208. TimeTagger lists first-class Docker deployment; Anuko Time Tracker does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Anuko Time Tracker if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose TimeTagger if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Anuko Time Tracker or TimeTagger better?
Neither is universally better. TimeTagger has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Anuko Time Tracker and TimeTagger free and open-source?
Yes. Anuko Time Tracker is licensed under GPL-3.0 and TimeTagger under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anuko Time Tracker and TimeTagger with Docker?
Anuko Time Tracker: check the project docs for container support. TimeTagger: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Anuko Time Tracker or TimeTagger?
TimeTagger has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Anuko Time Tracker. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.