Solidtime vs TimeTagger

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSolidtimeTimeTagger
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePHPPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 8,846★ 1,769
First released20242021
ReplacesToggl, Clockify, HarvestToggl, Harvest

Why pick each one

Choose Solidtime if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 8.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in PHP
Solidtime details

Choose TimeTagger if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
TimeTagger details

Frequently asked questions

Is Solidtime or TimeTagger better?

Neither is universally better. Solidtime has the larger community, while TimeTagger is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Solidtime and TimeTagger free and open-source?

Yes. Solidtime is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and TimeTagger under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Solidtime and TimeTagger with Docker?

Solidtime: yes. TimeTagger: yes.

Related comparisons