Hamster vs TimeTagger

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHamsterTimeTagger
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 1,127★ 1,769
First released20082021
ReplacesToggl, RescueTimeToggl, Harvest

Why pick each one

Choose Hamster if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Hamster details

Choose TimeTagger if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
TimeTagger details

Frequently asked questions

Is Hamster or TimeTagger better?

Neither is universally better. TimeTagger has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Hamster and TimeTagger free and open-source?

Yes. Hamster is licensed under GPL-3.0 and TimeTagger under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Hamster and TimeTagger with Docker?

Hamster: check the project docs for container support. TimeTagger: yes.

Related comparisons