gtimelog vs TimeTagger
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
gtimelog
Minimalist time logging desktop application
VS
TimeTagger
Tag-based time tracker with an interactive timeline
| Feature | gtimelog | TimeTagger |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 276 | ★ 1,769 |
| First released | 2008 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Toggl | Toggl, Harvest |
Why pick each one
Choose gtimelog if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose TimeTagger if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is gtimelog or TimeTagger better?
Neither is universally better. TimeTagger has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are gtimelog and TimeTagger free and open-source?
Yes. gtimelog is licensed under GPL-2.0 and TimeTagger under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run gtimelog and TimeTagger with Docker?
gtimelog: check the project docs for container support. TimeTagger: yes.