gtimelog vs Timewarrior
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
gtimelog
Minimalist time logging desktop application
VS
Timewarrior
Command-line time tracking with powerful reporting
| Feature | gtimelog | Timewarrior |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 276 | ★ 1,637 |
| First released | 2008 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Toggl | Toggl |
Why pick each one
Choose gtimelog if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Timewarrior if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is gtimelog or Timewarrior better?
Neither is universally better. Timewarrior has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are gtimelog and Timewarrior free and open-source?
Yes. gtimelog is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Timewarrior under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run gtimelog and Timewarrior with Docker?
gtimelog: check the project docs for container support. Timewarrior: check the project docs for container support.