Ever Teams vs Timewarrior
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Ever Teams | Timewarrior |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 80 · Excellent | 85 · Excellent |
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 585 | ★ 1,663 |
| First released | 2022 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Hubstaff, Toggl | Toggl |
What are Ever Teams and Timewarrior?
Ever Teams
Ever Teams is an open-source work time tracking and team management application for productivity-focused organizations. It records hours against tasks and projects with timer modes and team activity views.
- Task-based time tracking
- Team activity view
- Timer modes
- Productivity reports
Timewarrior
Timewarrior is a command-line time tracking utility that records start and stop times of tracked activities. It offers flexible tagging, reports, and analytics for personal productivity.
- Pure command-line workflow
- Tag-based tracking
- Flexible reports and charts
- Integrates with Taskwarrior
Ever Teams vs Timewarrior: key differences
Ever Teams is written in TypeScript, while Timewarrior is built with C++. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for Ever Teams versus MIT for Timewarrior. Timewarrior is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Ever Teams. Timewarrior is the more established project (first released 2016), while Ever Teams arrived in 2022. Timewarrior has the considerably larger community, at 1,663 GitHub stars versus 585. Ever Teams lists first-class Docker deployment; Timewarrior does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Ever Teams if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Timewarrior if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is Ever Teams or Timewarrior better?
Timewarrior is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Ever Teams if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Ever Teams and Timewarrior free and open-source?
Yes. Ever Teams is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Timewarrior under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ever Teams and Timewarrior with Docker?
Ever Teams: yes. Timewarrior: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Ever Teams or Timewarrior?
Timewarrior has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Ever Teams. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.