rustypaste vs Updog
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
rustypaste
Minimal file upload and pastebin service
VS
Updog
Replacement for Python SimpleHTTPServer with uploads
| Feature | rustypaste | Updog |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,192 | ★ 3,386 |
| First released | 2021 | 2019 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer, Imgur | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose rustypaste if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
Choose Updog if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is rustypaste or Updog better?
Neither is universally better. Updog has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are rustypaste and Updog free and open-source?
Yes. rustypaste is licensed under MIT and Updog under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run rustypaste and Updog with Docker?
rustypaste: yes. Updog: check the project docs for container support.