Chibisafe vs rustypaste

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureChibisaferustypaste
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptRust
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB32 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,748★ 1,192
First released20192021
ReplacesImgur, DropboxWeTransfer, Imgur

Why pick each one

Choose Chibisafe if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Chibisafe details

Choose rustypaste if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
rustypaste details

Frequently asked questions

Is Chibisafe or rustypaste better?

Neither is universally better. Chibisafe has the larger community, while rustypaste is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Chibisafe and rustypaste free and open-source?

Yes. Chibisafe is licensed under MIT and rustypaste under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Chibisafe and rustypaste with Docker?

Chibisafe: yes. rustypaste: yes.

Related comparisons