Jirafeau vs rustypaste
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jirafeau
Upload a file in a simple way and give a unique link to it
VS
rustypaste
Minimal file upload and pastebin service
| Feature | Jirafeau | rustypaste |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0-only | MIT |
| Language | Rust | |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 1,192 |
| First released | 2023 | 2021 |
| Replaces | ImageShack, Imgur | WeTransfer, Imgur |
Why pick each one
Choose Jirafeau if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose rustypaste if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Jirafeau or rustypaste better?
rustypaste is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jirafeau if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Jirafeau and rustypaste free and open-source?
Yes. Jirafeau is licensed under AGPL-3.0-only and rustypaste under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jirafeau and rustypaste with Docker?
Jirafeau: check the project docs for container support. rustypaste: yes.