rustypaste vs Zipline
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
rustypaste
Minimal file upload and pastebin service
VS
Zipline
ShareX and file upload server with a clean dashboard
| Feature | rustypaste | Zipline |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Rust | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,192 | ★ 3,313 |
| First released | 2021 | 2021 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer, Imgur | Imgur, Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose rustypaste if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
Choose Zipline if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is rustypaste or Zipline better?
Neither is universally better. Zipline has the larger community, while rustypaste is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are rustypaste and Zipline free and open-source?
Yes. rustypaste is licensed under MIT and Zipline under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run rustypaste and Zipline with Docker?
rustypaste: yes. Zipline: yes.