FilePizza vs rustypaste
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
VS
rustypaste
Minimal file upload and pastebin service
| Feature | FilePizza | rustypaste |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,129 | ★ 1,192 |
| First released | 2023 | 2021 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer, Imgur |
Why pick each one
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose rustypaste if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is FilePizza or rustypaste better?
Neither is universally better. FilePizza has the larger community, while rustypaste is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are FilePizza and rustypaste free and open-source?
Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and rustypaste under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FilePizza and rustypaste with Docker?
FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. rustypaste: yes.