FilePizza vs Linx

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFilePizzaLinx
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM50 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 10,129★ 1,581
First released20232015
ReplacesWeTransferWeTransfer, Imgur

Why pick each one

Choose FilePizza if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
FilePizza details

Choose Linx if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Linx details

Frequently asked questions

Is FilePizza or Linx better?

Neither is universally better. FilePizza has the larger community, while Linx is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are FilePizza and Linx free and open-source?

Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Linx under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FilePizza and Linx with Docker?

FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. Linx: yes.

Related comparisons