Linx vs Lufi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Linx
Self-hosted file and code paste sharing server
VS
Lufi
Let users fight uploads with client-side encryption
| Feature | Linx | Lufi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Perl |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,581 | ★ 300 |
| First released | 2015 | 2015 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer, Imgur | WeTransfer, Firefox Send |
Why pick each one
Choose Linx if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Choose Lufi if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Perl
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Linx or Lufi better?
Linx is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Lufi if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Linx and Lufi free and open-source?
Yes. Linx is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Lufi under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Linx and Lufi with Docker?
Linx: yes. Lufi: yes.