FilePizza vs Lufi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
VS
Lufi
Let users fight uploads with client-side encryption
| Feature | FilePizza | Lufi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Perl |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,129 | ★ 300 |
| First released | 2023 | 2015 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer, Firefox Send |
Why pick each one
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose Lufi if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Perl
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FilePizza or Lufi better?
Neither is universally better. FilePizza has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FilePizza and Lufi free and open-source?
Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Lufi under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FilePizza and Lufi with Docker?
FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. Lufi: yes.