Kleeja vs Lufi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kleeja
Free upload and file-sharing application
VS
Lufi
Let users fight uploads with client-side encryption
| Feature | Kleeja | Lufi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Perl |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 193 | ★ 300 |
| First released | 2006 | 2015 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer, Firefox Send |
Why pick each one
Choose Kleeja if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Lufi if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Perl
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Kleeja or Lufi better?
Neither is universally better. Lufi has the larger community, while Kleeja is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Kleeja and Lufi free and open-source?
Yes. Kleeja is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Lufi under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kleeja and Lufi with Docker?
Kleeja: check the project docs for container support. Lufi: yes.