FilePizza vs Kleeja

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFilePizzaKleeja
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM50 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 10,129★ 193
First released20232006
ReplacesWeTransferWeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose FilePizza if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
FilePizza details

Choose Kleeja if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Kleeja details

Frequently asked questions

Is FilePizza or Kleeja better?

Neither is universally better. FilePizza has the larger community, while Kleeja is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are FilePizza and Kleeja free and open-source?

Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Kleeja under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FilePizza and Kleeja with Docker?

FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. Kleeja: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons