croc vs FilePizza

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocFilePizza
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITBSD-3-Clause
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB50 MB
Deploymentbinarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 10,129
First released20182023
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropWeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose FilePizza if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
FilePizza details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or FilePizza better?

croc is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider FilePizza if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are croc and FilePizza free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and FilePizza under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and FilePizza with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. FilePizza: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons