croc vs Flying Carpet

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocFlying Carpet
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 5,266
First released20182017
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropAirDrop, Snapdrop

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose Flying Carpet if…

  • Works fully offline
  • Cross-platform including mobile
Flying Carpet details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or Flying Carpet better?

Neither is universally better. croc has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are croc and Flying Carpet free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and Flying Carpet under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and Flying Carpet with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. Flying Carpet: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons