croc vs rustypaste

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurecrocrustypaste
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB32 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 1,192
First released20182021
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropWeTransfer, Imgur

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose rustypaste if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
rustypaste details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or rustypaste better?

Neither is universally better. croc has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are croc and rustypaste free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and rustypaste under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and rustypaste with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. rustypaste: yes.

Related comparisons