Chibisafe vs Pomf
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Chibisafe | Pomf |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,748 | ★ 922 |
| First released | 2019 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Imgur, Dropbox | WeTransfer, Imgur |
Why pick each one
Choose Chibisafe if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Pomf if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Chibisafe or Pomf better?
Neither is universally better. Chibisafe has the larger community, while Pomf is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Chibisafe and Pomf free and open-source?
Yes. Chibisafe is licensed under MIT and Pomf under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Chibisafe and Pomf with Docker?
Chibisafe: yes. Pomf: check the project docs for container support.