Pomf vs Zipline
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Pomf
Simple file uploading and sharing platform
VS
Zipline
ShareX and file upload server with a clean dashboard
| Feature | Pomf | Zipline |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 922 | ★ 3,313 |
| First released | 2015 | 2021 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer, Imgur | Imgur, Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose Pomf if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Zipline if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Pomf or Zipline better?
Neither is universally better. Zipline has the larger community, while Pomf is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Pomf and Zipline free and open-source?
Yes. Pomf is licensed under MIT and Zipline under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Pomf and Zipline with Docker?
Pomf: check the project docs for container support. Zipline: yes.