FilePizza vs Updog

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFilePizzaUpdog
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMIT
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM50 MB32 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary
GitHub stars★ 10,129★ 3,386
First released20232019
ReplacesWeTransferWeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose FilePizza if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
FilePizza details

Choose Updog if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Updog details

Frequently asked questions

Is FilePizza or Updog better?

Neither is universally better. FilePizza has the larger community, while Updog is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are FilePizza and Updog free and open-source?

Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Updog under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FilePizza and Updog with Docker?

FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. Updog: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons